The Impact of Linguistic Method on the
Analysis of Constituent Structure
in Previous work on New
Testament Greek
Have you ever wondered why the Blass-Debrunner grammar
(A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature)
reads so differently from Moulton-Howard-Turner? Or why more recent studies
have proposed such radical departures from some of the analyses found in
these grammars? Read this chapter and you will understand why these differences
exist and why they are important.
The differences between the traditional grammars
are relatively minor when it comes to the main topic of this book: constituent
structure. The basic list of grammatical categories was fairly firmly set
by the time they were published and consisted mostly of word-level categories
like noun, verb, and preposition. With the application of structuralist
methods as early as the 1960s, though, that list began to expand to include
phrase-level categories such as noun-phrase, verb-phrase, and prepositional-phrase.
The point of this book is that even this two-tier system of categories
is not sufficient to explain some very important aspects of Hellenistic
Greek grammar.